India’s use of home advantage isn’t unfair, but it does produce one-dimensional and turgid cricket that nobody would want to watch.
If Test cricket is to survive, it must be embraced by India, in such a way that makes people want to watch it.
The most recent series between India and South Africa, blunted the Proteas usually explosive batsmen.
On the one hand, it was a brilliant assertion of Indian home advantage, as India won 3-0. But it also turned me off watching.
As a neutral, I found the cricket as I would expect too.
A little bit predictable, almost scripted, and very dry.
It was a series, engineered to be dominated by certain players.
Spinners, and by Indian batsmen who can play spin.
Neither of these facets, South Africa have in abundance.
When sides tour England, the pitches help seam bowlers and batsmen who can leave the ball.
There is, one cannot stress enough, nothing wrong with preparing pitches to suit a home side.
But, there has to be a contest generated, or else it stops being entertainment, and begins to be a foregone conclusion.
In the most recent series’, of the top six run scorers, five were Indians.
Only two South African fifties were scored in the duration (both by Ab de Villiers), with only one South African averaging over 30 (again, Ab de Villiers).
The top two wicket-takers in the series, were the Indian spin twins Ravi Ashwin and Jadeja taking 31 and 23 wickets.
Nobody else in the Indian attack passed seven wickets.
Following the 3-0 victory, India should have been triumphant. But, all the conjecture was about the pitches.
Not necessarily because they were ‘bad pitches’, but because it produced boring cricket.
In the first Test, both sides made a turning pitch look a lot worse than it was. Four low-scoring innings of 201, 184 200 and 109 suggest an inability to play the surface, as the match finished in three days.
The second Test was of course washed out.
The third Test at Nagpur however, was rated as a ‘poor’ pitch by the ICC, whilst the final Test produced a block-a-thon.
In that final Test, in the fourth innings, Amla scored 25 off 244 balls, De Villiers 43 off 297, with the overall team going at under one run per over for 143 overs.
When asked about the state of Indian pitches during the series’, Indian spinner Amit Mishra said: “We also get seaming pitches when we go out of India. We also adjust. We don’t complain. They need to adjust.”
To an extent, he is right. But on the other hand, he is also missing the point: The brand of cricket these pitches produce is exceptionally negative.
No pitch curator would dream of creating such a surface for a T20 or ODI match, in which there is a desire to produce exciting cricket.
The droll cricket in this series may be something one can appreciate. Especially if you’re sitting behind a screen looking at a scorecard years down the line, admiring the resilience of AB de Villiers.
But in reality, every cricket fan hopes that a block-a-thon, never happens if you’re in the ground yourself.
I would certainly be angry if I turned up at Lord’s and saw 143 runs in 143 overs.
India need to find that balance between home advantage and producing good cricket.
At the moment, they are experts at the former, and failing miserably at the latter.